Abbreviated Pundit Roundupis a long-running series published every morning that collects essential political discussion and analysis around the internet.
Aaron Rupar/”Public Notice” on Substack:
Charlie Sykes on the GOP's Trump cult
"In the minds of MAGA world, he has never lost. There have been no defeats."
A lot of pixels have been spilled,including in this newsletter, about what will happen if Trump wins later this year. But less attention has been paid to what comes next for the GOP if he loses.
Would another presidential loss and fourth straight disappointing election cycle for Republicans persuade them to finally move past MAGA? Hah! That ain’t happening. In fact, as Charlie Sykes told us, it’s not at all beyond the realm of possibility that Trump winds up being the GOP’s presidential nominee again in 2028.
“In many ways, Republicans are being held hostage by their own voters,” Sykes said. “The party is afraid of its own supporters. That Republican base wants the kind of Trumpist anger that he continues to stoke.”
This whole thread. This is not fringe but core to the GOP and the driving force behind Project 2025. I bring the survey evidence toward the end of the thread. https://t.co/xMh6jUgogu
— Paul Djupe (@PaulDjupe) July 4, 2024
Max Burns/X via Threadreader:
Here are just a few of the nightmares contained in Project 2025, the @GOP's far-right extremist vision for a second Trump presidency:
Kevin Roberts’ foreword to Project 2025 calls for the president to use undefined “emergency powers” to prosecute companies involved in the production and sale of pornography.
Using the 1873 Comstock Act anti-vice law to criminalize the sending of abortion pills, contraception and literature advocating for abortion through the U.S. Postal Service
Reversing the FDA’s approval of abortion pills and implement a ban on both pill and surgical abortion nationwide
Eliminating the entire federal Civil Service and replacing it with appointees solely loyal to Donald Trump.
See AlsoDAILY KOS: Help save democracy with this one weird trickUkraine-Liveblog: ++ Zehntausende neue Soldaten für russische Armee ++DAILY KOS: The Supreme Court just limited federal power. Health care is feeling the shockwavesDAILY KOS: Morning Digest: Court blocks yet another discriminatory GOP map, this time in Mississippi
Trump distances himself from Project 2025 -- run by the Heritage Foundation -- which lays out an extremely conservative roadmap they want Trump to adopt should he win the election Many people involved in Project 2025 are close to Trump world & have served in his previous admin pic.twitter.com/uIw0G2L7oZ
— Alayna Treene (@alaynatreene) July 5, 2024
Bill Scher/Washington Monthly:
I’ve Defended Biden for Years. Now, I’m Asking Him to Withdraw
After waiting too long to reassure the public of his mental fitness, the president is sinking in the polls with little hope for recovery. But he can resign with grace and make history.
I’vealso been making the case against ageism for just as long,defending Nancy Pelosi in 2017from critics who thought a fresh face was needed for Democrats to win back the House and in 2018 from those who thought sheshouldn’t reclaim theSpeaker’s gavel once they did. More recently, I’ve argued that throughout American history,ageist attacks on elderlypresidential candidates have fallen flat.
So, Iwasn’tinclined to say that Biden couldn’t win because of his advanced age. Last year, I argued the opposite—as with every other incumbent in the past 100 years, Biden waslikely to be re-electedas long as the economy kept improving, which it has.
But the CNN debate and Biden’s feeble attempts at damage control after the debate have irrevocably altered the political landscape. The risk of continuing the campaign is too great. Biden should withdraw.
Periodic reminder that no one KNOWS what's going to happen, and anyone telling you they do is lying or delusional (or both).
— Natalie Jackson (@nataliemj10) July 5, 2024
Josh Marshall/TPM:
Couple Thoughts on What’s Next
In one of the DC newsletters this morning,Mike Allen largely streamedthe Trump campaign’s inner monologue about the “brutal attack” they plan to unleash on Kamala Harris if and when she becomes the nominee (and I really think it’s very likely when, not if)...
Trump’s campaign has spent three years thinking it was running against Joe Biden. Well — if this set of events transpires — he’s not. He’s running against someone young and vital. His entire plan of battle goes out the window. It’s hard to overestimate how important that is. But that’s not the case for Democrats. They’re still running against a deeply unpopular candidate, who outlawedRoe v Wade, who staged a coup against the state, who’s a convicted felon, who most Americans don’t want to see as President again. The whole two-very-old-very-unpopular-candidates model, well, that’s out the window. Harris at the top of the ticket pushes abortion even higher into salience. Republicans will try to shift things back to questions about Joe Biden. Why this? Why that? Harris has a perfect, taunting rejoinder every time: “Focus, Donald. You’re not running against Joe Biden anymore. You’re running against me, Kamala Harris.”
There’s a ton for Democrats to lean into here. And I hope they will.
Trump distancing himself from project 2025 tells you that he knows how unpopular his party’s platforms are.
— Molly Jong-Fast (@MollyJongFast) July 5, 2024
Lyle Denniston/Law News:
The Court and Trump: The guardrails fail
In the epic constitutional drama pitting the Supreme Court and Donald Trump on the national stage, there were two missing factors and their absence strongly influenced the outcome.
First was the Court’s insensitivity to the corrosive cynicism that produced this historic drama in the first place.
Second was the Court’s refusal to acknowledge the complete lack of good faith on Trump’s part throughout this constitutional saga.
What is abundantly clear, as the nation absorbs what it means that Presidents – past, present and future – are now constitutionally immune to almost any real legal accountability, is that the system of law sometimes is just too self-absorbed and two structurally rigid to take into account serious failings in human character.
The destruction of the Tories in their home counties heartlands is just extraordinary. Before the election - in Berkshire, Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire - they held 34 of the 42 seats. They now hold 8.
— Sam Freedman (@Samfr) July 6, 2024
Wisconsin Supreme Court reinstates absentee ballot drop boxes
Wisconsin’s liberal-controlled Supreme Court on Friday restored the use ofabsentee ballot drop boxesin the swing state ahead of the upcoming elections — a reversal of a past decision from the court that could impact voter participation.
The 4-3 decision was a win for Democrats who argued the longstanding practice of allowing voters to file ballots into the locked, unmanned boxes made voting more accessible. That process, however, was highly criticized in 2020 by former President Donald Trump and Republicans who claimed without evidence that the boxes and absentee voting were rife with fraud.
BREAKING: Reformist Pezeshkian wins Iran's presidential runoff election, besting hard-liner Jalili https://t.co/GiwGYqKqPZ
— The Associated Press (@AP) July 6, 2024
Chaminda Jayanetti/X via Threadreader:
While I wait to fall asleep, some thoughts on the election results. Labour achieving such a giant majority without increasing its vote share in England or Wales from its catastrophic 2019 defeat is extraordinary. It does not follow that this was mere accident or luck, however
Had Labour not detoxified its brand - had the prospect of a Labour government still sparked widespread concern as it did in 2019 (and, to a lesser degree, 2017), the right wing vote would have been much likelier to unite, and the LDs would not have marched through the Tory South
We know this because... that's literally what happened in 2019 - the right wing vote united and the LDs flopped. You might not have seen a Farage/Tory deal as in 2019 (unless Labour had pledged to rejoin the EU or something), but there'd have been less of a civil war on the right
I don't know what the result would have been, but it wouldn't have been a pulverising Labour majority.
The reason Trump posted about it is because one of the architects of Project 2025, which has the complete support and blessing of the Trump campaign, admitted this is their revolution and the majority better accept it...or else. "Kneel or die" essentially. Not good politics! 2/
— Wajahat Ali (@WajahatAli) July 6, 2024
Cliff Schecter on Mayor Pete taking it to MAGA:
Greg Dworkin July 06, 2024 at 12:00PM From Daily Kos